Відео

Great video 😊

I liked the last plane.

The Icon sales agreement is nothing short of Draconian.

Good $200k airplane

Well made videos. If you can add Tech specs for the aircraft, it will be great.

Ran's S-19 ?

Super thanks 🙏

Cost per flight hour please and life limits on airframe?

I like the last one the most. I was looking for things like the piper cub, piper Cherokee, Cessna 172 or 185. I’ve never heard of these ones.

#1 in what looks like smooth flying.. The Spirit of excellence!

You dont see many 505’s around.

King Air 260 for me.

The number on find it Cool ❤

I take Honda jet 😂😂

Reason 1: The flight deck, flight controls and navigation systems are almost unaltered from other 320/321s. Reason 2: The fuselage barrel of the XLR remains unchanged from all other 318/319 320/321 versions. Reason 3: By carrying more fuel, range is increased, but it will carry less passengers and perhaps no cargo at all. Reason 4: Since the additional fuel is carried in the fuselage, the cargo capacity is severely reduced. Reason 5: The engines may be slightly quieter, but the P&W geared turbofan engine remains unreliable and for now, and thus is not the ideal power-plant for ETOPS routes. Furthermore, since its wing area and main landing gear has remained almost unchanged its take-off performance from high and hot airport will be highly compromised. At last and not least, both FAA and EASA remain skeptical about the integral RCT's (read central fuel tank) safety. The certification process lags one year behind.

Me encanta , que aviones tan buenos, como me gustaría aprender con practica a pilotar uno de esos fantásticos aviones. El problema es económico. Además tendria que aprender empezando por lo mas fácil . como un párvulo. No la gramática. empezando con un simulador de vuelo. claro. ingles partiendo de cero. No empezando por la Gramática

Please advise full fuel payload available...DBS

Not supporting Chinese communism.

Not enough information

🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸🇺🇸☝️🇺🇸☝️☝️🇺🇸

You only buy cirrus if you want to support Chinese communism.

Thank you.

Your prices are way off. You are quoting fuselage kit prices that are missing firewall forward components which is the most expensive part...

Thanks Dhanywad OM

The one with a toilet wins, and the Sikorsky seems to be the one who might have it. ...if it doesn't, they are all garbage.

But the Kodiak is so ugly

The sikorsky anti birdstrike feature is good.

Why are you comparing two 10 -12 million dollar planes to a 30 million dollar plane?

The 701 and 750 are a little too slow for my needs but the 650 might be ok on speed, but has not as much room as a 750.

I like the RV 6 but like the RV 7 even better.

I like flying very much.

Excellent stuff

The 1st Military customer for the AW-139 was the Irish Air Corps

Short range crap

ATR-72 is my favorite turboprop airliner. The Bombardier Q-400 is ugly!

👍👍⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Is fantastic❤

excellent video, I find it wonderful that Junkers Aircraft and Waco offer this extraordinary wonder of aviation, of course I will be happy to fly it in the not too distant future, I have been flying L19 Bird Dog as a pilot for more than 34 years and also Stearman PT -17, and all these airplanes that are part of the history of aviation are a beautiful gift for those of us who like this world of flying, I hope you can upload some additional videos with more details, of the preflight, flight and landing stages, including A50 Heritahe and A60. And if you can also some video of the production line of these airplanes. Congratulations and I wish them great sales success.

#2 the HP seems like good value

Enjoyed the video, but would have liked the specifications like you did on a previous video on the lightweight 2 seater sport planes. The speed, distance, weight of plane. And maximum carry capacity with baggage square feet. Thanks for the enjoyable video’s. Sincerely, David Gienger

You have Super Petrel LS misspelled as Super Petrol LS in the third video chapter.

These are all exceptional aircraft, however my preference hands down would be the Grumman Goose.

You missed on 4 points. 1st: the VoltAero Cassio is simply a re-engined Cessna 337. While I will admit the engine choice is unique, its basic air frame is still built by Cessna. 2nd: I've heard Rutan pronounce his name as Ru'tan, not ruten. Just an accent difference, I guess. The French auto manufacturer Renault has the same problem in America when it used one pronunciation during the 1960's (into the mid to late 1970's and earlier) in the US and has since reverted back to the actual (and proper) pronunciation later. 3rd: The Dornier (which has a French pronunciation as well as an Anglicized one) Seastar is actually a re-engineered design from the mid 1930's, the Dornier Do 18. Dornier also designed and built 2 other, radically different pusher/pullers of WWII era: the massive 4 engine/2 nacelle Do 26 and the equally impressive Do 335 "Arrow" fighter. Not surprising from the same man/company which pioneered the Do X 12-engine (in 6 pusher/puller above wing nacelles) flying boat whose first flight was in 1929! Top spot should have gone to the Cessna 337 since it was not only a full production aircraft with several variants, but also saw military service during the Vietnam War as the O-2. All the others were of limited or "kit" production, although the DoubleEnder could change that.

Is there any beginner planes with a range of around 2000 miles?

I like #1

I think the Diamond 6PX was the most impressive

..my choice is the Cirrus Jet..is quite cheap n guarantee more safety by d Parachute, self landing programs n with low maintenance levels..

I like the bell 505

Not within pistol range of certain cities.

Beautiful bird